Skip to main content
Practical Breeding

How to Read an Embark DNA Report for Your Poodle

Poodle Genetics Lab5 min readSupported but incomplete

Embark is the DNA test most poodle owners actually hold in their hand, and its report reads more simply than any other lab's — which is exactly what makes it easy to over-trust. This is a walkthrough of how Embark actually labels a result, not a repeat of what a health panel result licenses you to conclude — read that one first if you haven't; this article assumes it.

The three-word system

Embark's own site reports every screened condition one of three ways:

  • Clear — zero copies of the variant Embark tests for
  • Carrier — one copy
  • At-Risk — two copies

This is confirmed directly from Embark's own published breeder summary report, cross-checked against real Poodle-panel percentages for several conditions — not a guess at their wording. If your Poodle's report says "Carrier" next to prcd-PRA, that is Embark's own word for one copy, not PGL's paraphrase of it.

The trap: "Carrier" reads as a single, uniform category, and on Embark's report it visually is one. Underneath, it is not. A carrier for a clean recessive disease (prcd-PRA, most of Embark's 270+ screened conditions) really does mean what the word implies: unaffected, can pass the variant on, breed with a Clear partner and you are safe. A carrier for CDDY — the IVDD-associated variant Embark also screens — means something with a much lower, breed-dependent confidence, because CDDY's risk strength is established in some breeds and not confirmed in Poodles specifically. Embark's label does not tell you which kind of line you are looking at. You have to know that going in.

Chart showing that two lines on an Embark poodle DNA report can both read Carrier while meaning different things: prcd-PRA is a clean recessive, while CDDY has a breed-dependent risk strength not confirmed in poodles.
Two Lines That Both Say “Carrier” — free PGL reference cardDownload the card ↓

Where the pattern actually breaks

Embark's own three-word system does not cover every line on your report. CDPA and ALT (a copper-metabolism enzyme-activity marker, not a disease call) are reported outside the Clear/Carrier/At-Risk framework entirely — this is confirmed from Embark's own health-conditions documentation, not an assumption carried over from a different lab. If a line on your report doesn't fit the three-word pattern, that is not a report error. Check what that specific line is actually measuring before assuming it slots into the usual scale.

A real place this causes missed results: Embark places the CDPA result under the report's Traits section, not Health. A breeder scanning "the health results" to share with a puppy buyer or co-owner can miss it entirely — not because anyone hid it, but because it's filed somewhere a health-focused reader isn't looking. If you're sharing a Poodle's Embark results with anyone for a health-relevant reason, check the Traits section too, not just Health.

Where Embark's report earns its keep

One thing Embark reports that none of the other labs on this list do: a Red Intensity marker, scored 0–10. If you're breeding specifically for red, apricot, or cream shade prediction, this is the reason to test with Embark over the others — none of the other four labs in this cluster report an equivalent shade-intensity score. Embark does not offer merle base-pair- length testing at all, so if merle length class is what you need, this isn't the lab for it — see the UC Davis VGL guide for that.

What a Poodle-specific panel actually screens

Embark's dog-DNA-test product screens 270+ health conditions across 17 body-system categories and reports on 55 named coat/trait genes, alongside breed composition. Not every one of those 270+ conditions is relevant to Poodles specifically — a result being "on the report" does not mean it is a Poodle concern. This is exactly the judgment call the general health-panel guide walks through: evidence tier, not just genotype, decides whether a line means anything for your dog's breed.

One honest gap

This article is built from Embark's own published one-page breeder summary report — the source with the most confirmed, currently-verifiable wording. Embark's full multi-page consumer report (viewed inside a signed-in account) was not independently reviewed for this article, so if your own full report shows additional formatting beyond the three-word system described above, trust what's actually printed on your copy over this page.

How Embark compares to the other labs breeders use

No single lab covers everything. Here's where Embark sits against the other four labs this cluster covers, based on what each lab's product actually offers and, for the two flagged rows, what breeders in the field commonly report rather than an independent accuracy study:

LabBreed IDMerle Base Pair TestOrder by locusTurnaroundNotable
EmbarkYes, generally accurateNot offeredNo — bundled panels onlyStandardOnly lab here with a Red Intensity marker (0–10)
UC Davis VGLNot offeredYes — the only lab here with base-pair-length testingYesStandardThe precise assay for merle length class
Wisdom PanelYesNot offeredNoStandardImproved over time, but see that guide's note on breeder-reported reliability
Animal GeneticsNot offeredNot offered (see that guide's note on merle-screening accuracy)YesFastest of the five
Orivet / Paw Print GeneticsNot independently confirmedNot independently confirmedNot independently confirmedNot independently confirmedReport format not independently confirmed for this cluster

Put your actual results through the tool

Once you know what each line on your Embark report is really claiming, the next step is running your dog's actual results — and, if you're evaluating a pairing, both parents' results — through a real calculation instead of eyeballing percentages.

Decode your Embark results in the DNA Report Interpreter →

The interpreter's Embark option uses this exact Clear / Carrier / At-Risk wording, so you enter what your report actually says rather than translating it into a generic scale first.

Download the Poodle Health Panel Worksheet for a printable summary.

Supported but incompleteScientific status

Credible evidence supports what is described here, but the mechanism, the population studied, or its application to Poodles still has limits. The literature below is real and cited in full; where it stops short, the article says so rather than rounding up.

Published
September 11, 2026
Last reviewed
August 25, 2026

References

  1. Parker HG, VonHoldt BM, Quignon P, et al. (2009). An expressed Fgf4 retrogene is associated with breed-defining chondrodysplasia in domestic dogs. Science 325(5943): 995–998. doi:10.1126/science.1173275

Free Tool

Apply This Knowledge

Put two parents’ DNA panel results through the calculator and see the odds, line by line.

Try the Health Calculator
#dna-testing#embark#test-interpretation#breeding-decisions#panel-results

Continue Learning

Go Deeper

Poodle Color Genetics, 2nd Edition

The most comprehensive reference on poodle coat color genetics ever published. Over 300 pages covering every locus, color probability tables, updated merle health risk matrices, and detailed breeding strategies.

View the Book →

Stay Updated on Poodle Genetics Research

New articles, calculator improvements, and genetics research updates, delivered to your inbox.